![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lady_branwynResearchers at the "Tolkien Sarcasm Page" have discovered the truth about Tom Bombadil. Mere coincidence or something more sinister? You decide for yourself.
Edit: As a bonus, here is their review of Bakshi's Lord of the Rings.
Edit: As a bonus, here is their review of Bakshi's Lord of the Rings.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 10:49 pm (UTC)Although actually I love this one in particular- I've been sitting here singing it!
no subject
Date: 2011-03-20 03:05 am (UTC)We're Anglo-Saxon to the core although we fight on horses proud
Hee! I've read essays claiming that since the Rohirrim were a horse culture, they couldn't be modeled on the Anglo-Saxons. My theory is that Tolkien put the Rohirrim on horses because he himself had trained with a cavalry unit (King Edward's Horse) while an undergrad at Oxford. His understanding of non-mechanized warfare (this was a few years before WW1) was probably influenced by his experiences as a cavalryman. Also, he is supposed to have had a natural affinity for horses, and that is easy to believe based on how he wrote about them.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-20 05:46 pm (UTC)Coming from somewhere with a Celto-Viking history we only touched on the Anglo-Saxons in history lessons, that I remember. When I first read LotR I saw the Rohirrim as simply being horse-born Vikings.
Oddly, one of the things I remember about Anglo-Saxons is that they were very like the Vikings and that their basic war-bands were usually about 30 strong - much the same size as their basic boat crews.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-17 10:55 pm (UTC)I never did like Tom. Now I know why :>)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-20 02:41 am (UTC)